Ajay Devgn Just Had His Biggest Opening Ever. The Malayalam Version Still Beat Him Abroad.

Drishyam 3 took ₹66.75 crore net on day one, the biggest opening of Ajay Devgn's career. The Malayalam version still out-earned it overseas by ₹10 crore.

Drishyam: The Conclusion, the film almost every trade report is still calling Drishyam 3, opened on Gandhi Jayanti, and the Hindi film industry finally got the number it has spent two years waiting for. The Abhishek Pathak directorial took ₹66.75 crore net in India on day one, ₹80.10 crore gross, and ₹95.10 crore worldwide once the roughly ₹15 crore overseas haul is added, according to The Week. That is the biggest opening day of Ajay Devgn’s career by a margin that is not even close, and by The Week’s count the third biggest opening day any Hindi film has ever had, behind only Dhurandhar 2 and Jawan.

Then the asterisks start arriving.

Everyone agrees it is huge. Nobody agrees on the number.

We have been keeping a running tally of how wide the gap gets between trade sources on the same opening day, and Drishyam 3 is a clean example. Bollywood Hungama puts day one in a range of ₹63 crore to ₹66 crore and settles on ₹65 crore as its working estimate. The Week and the tracking data it draws on give a firm ₹66.75 crore net. Outlook and Storyboard18 both lead on the worldwide ₹95.10 crore.

The spread is under four percent, which by Indian box office standards is practically a consensus. We are reporting both rather than picking the bigger one, because the pattern across the last fortnight has been that the first number published is the number that gets quoted for a year.

Drishyam 2 opened at fifteen crore

This is the part that actually matters. Drishyam 2 opened at ₹15.38 crore net and ₹18.15 crore gross. The 2015 original opened at ₹5.85 crore net. So the franchise has gone from under six crore to over sixty-six in eleven years, and the jump from part two to part three alone is roughly 334 percent.

Sequels do not normally compound like this. What usually happens is a big second instalment, then a third that trades on goodwill and lands somewhere between the two. Drishyam went the other way because part two was not a theatrical phenomenon so much as a television and streaming one. An enormous number of people met this franchise on a TV set at nine on a Sunday night, and then showed up on day one of part three. That is the rarest asset in Hindi cinema right now: an audience that did not need to be convinced the film was an event.

The holiday, and the nine o’clock start

Honest caveat: 2 October was Gandhi Jayanti, a national holiday, and the film opened across 15,759 shows. A holiday Friday is the single most favourable launch slot in the Indian calendar, and no opening-day record set on one should be read as a like-for-like comparison with a working weekday.

Bollywood Hungama adds a wrinkle in the other direction. It reports that shows began only at 9 am rather than in the early morning, and that several national multiplex locations ran into genuine capacity limits, which means the number could plausibly have been higher with earlier screenings. Its first-weekend projection sits at ₹180 crore to ₹200 crore. Treat that as a projection, not a result.

Devgn’s own ladder

For scale, here is what the actor’s previous best openings look like. Singham Again took ₹43.70 crore net. Singham Returns took ₹32.09 crore. Golmaal Again took ₹30.14 crore. Drishyam 3 cleared the top of that list by more than ₹23 crore on a single day. Devgn has spent his career being the dependable one rather than the explosive one, and he has now posted an opening that most of the industry’s declared superstars have never managed.

The Malayalam number that should worry Bollywood

Here is the finding nobody is leading on. The Malayalam Drishyam 3, with Mohanlal and Jeethu Joseph, released on 21 May 2026 across 5,506 shows. It did ₹15.85 crore net in India, ₹18.37 crore gross, and ₹43.37 crore worldwide.

Its overseas number was ₹25 crore. The Hindi version’s overseas number was ₹15 crore.

Read that again. Mohanlal’s version earned roughly ₹10 crore more outside India, on about a third of the showcount, than the Hindi version that just posted the third biggest opening day in Hindi film history. The Malayalam industry’s overseas infrastructure, built patiently over decades on the Gulf diaspora, is doing numbers that Hindi cinema’s vastly larger domestic machine cannot match abroad.

We have been arguing for a fortnight that screen allocation in Hindi markets no longer tracks earning power. This is the same argument pointing the other way across a border: the showcount went to the Hindi version, the international money went to the Malayalam one.

What to watch

Day two advance sales, before actuals landed, pointed to a drop of around 21 percent on day one’s advance gross, which is normal and even healthy for a film this front-loaded. The real test is Monday. A holiday-powered Friday plus a weekend tells you about anticipation. The first working day tells you whether the film is any good, and whether the third act of a story whose entire appeal is its ending actually satisfied anyone.

Bengaluru Baath Take

Two years of think pieces about the death of the Hindi theatrical business, and the cure turns out to be a Malayalam remake about a man covering up a death in his own home. Nobody in Bollywood will draw the obvious lesson from that, which is that the bankable thing was never the star or the scale. It was the script, and the script was bought.

The genuinely uncomfortable statistic here is not the ₹66.75 crore. It is the ₹15 crore overseas against Mohanlal’s ₹25 crore. Hindi cinema has the screens, the marketing spend and the national footprint, and it is still getting outsold abroad by an industry a fraction of its size, with the same story, four months earlier. The record will get the headlines this weekend. The overseas line is the one worth taping to a wall.

A note on the title

The film’s official title, announced in August 2026, is Drishyam: The Conclusion. Most trade reporting, including every source cited here, refers to it as Drishyam 3. An earlier version of this piece used only Drishyam 3. We have corrected the first mention and left the trade usage where it appears in sourcing, because changing a source’s words is worse than carrying their shorthand.

Sources